Indies Love Starbucks?

Posted by Willmoore on Dec 30th, 2007
2007
Dec 30

Slate has a pretty interesting piece arguing that independent coffeehouses actually benefit when a Starbucks moves in next door.

Ever since Starbucks blanketed every functioning community in America with its cafes, the one effect of its expansion that has steamed people the most has been the widely assumed dying-off of mom and pop coffeehouses. …[but] strange as it sounds, the best way to boost sales at your independently owned coffeehouse may just be to have Starbucks move in next-door.

That’s certainly how it worked out for Hyman. Soon after declining Starbucks’s buyout offer, Hyman received the expected news that the company was opening up next to one of his stores. … Each new Starbucks store created a local buzz, drawing new converts to the latte-drinking fold. When the lines at Starbucks grew beyond the point of reason, these converts started venturing out—and, Look! There was another coffeehouse right next-door! Hyman’s new neighbor boosted his sales so much that he decided to turn the tactic around and start targeting Starbucks. “We bought a Chinese restaurant right next to one of their stores and converted it, and by God, it was doing $1 million a year right away,” he said.

It probably helps that Starbucks’ coffee doesn’t taste very good. Anyway this rings true. I don’t remember a ton of independent coffee shops being around in my hometown before the days of ubiquitous Starbucks storefronts, but now they’re much more common.

As the season comes to a close…

Posted by Karl on Dec 30th, 2007
2007
Dec 30

I thought I would share one of the best fan banners I’ve ever seen.

Best Banner Ever

BruceBartlett on FairTax

Posted by Willmoore on Dec 30th, 2007
2007
Dec 30

Supply-sider Bruce Bartlett has written a pretty detailed takedown (pdf) of the FairTax proposal. (I hate having to use focus-grouped marketingspeak. Will there be a competing tax proposal called the Howdy Duty and another called TaxHappy?) A shorter Bartlett OpinionJournal piece from back in August is here. Ilya Soman at Volokhs piles on.

This gives me some pause regarding Huckabee’s judgment about policy–but what do I know about tax policy? Maybe the Pro-FairTaxers will come out with a devastating counter-counter argument to the Bartlett types. But it also makes me question Huck’s vaunted political instincts. Is anyone really clamoring for this? Is there a large constituency that will be energized by this plan? Perhaps he should simply adopt the WillmoreWay, a.k.a. tax simplification and lower marginal rates.

Regardless of all this, I might have to support Huck anyway because his name is Huck. Does it get any more American than that?