Leave my carbon footprint alone; I’m looking forward to global warming.
Walter Williams has an alarming story concerning a proposed energy amendment in California. Apparently there is a proposal whereby any newly installed thermostat will be required to have the capability of being remotely controlled by the government. Why in the world would anyone want that? Well, to control energy usage. Let’s get California greener.
The California Energy Commission has recently proposed amendments to its standards for energy efficiency (www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-400-2007-017/CEC-400-2007-017-45DAY.PDF). These standards include a requirement that any new or modified heating or air conditioning system must include a programmable communicating thermostat (PCT) whose settings can be remotely controlled by government authorities. A thermostat czar, sitting in Sacramento, would be empowered to remotely reduce the heating or cooling of your house during what he deems as an “emergency event.”
Say you disagree with the czar’s temperature setting for your house, the California Energy Commission is one step ahead of you with the provision: “The PCT shall not allow customer changes to thermostat settings during emergency events.” In other words, the thermostat must be configured in a way that doesn’t allow the customer to override the czar’s decision.
The offending provision is on pages 63-64.
In a completely unrelated, but somehow pertinent, article. Michelle Malkin expresses her desire for a man. A man who rejects Big Nanny government. It would seem that Walter joins you in such a desire. Although, he would (as we would) probably find a different way to express it.
